Baby Dragons Born in Central Europe Jennifer Marino Walters

(Natural News) A shocking new study published in the New England Periodical of Medicine reveals that when meaning women are given covid vaccinations during their showtime or 2nd trimesters, they endure an 82% spontaneous abortion charge per unit, killing 4 out of five unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained below, is self-evident from the data published in a new report entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-xix Vaccine Safe in Significant Persons." Just as agonizing every bit the data is the fact that the study authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, we checked with our own science contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:

1. Yes, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their kickoff or second trimesters.
2. Yeah, the written report authors either deliberately sought to hibernate this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained beneath) or they are incompetent and fabricated a glaring error that brings into question their brownie.

In other words, this study was almost certainly a cover-up to try to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. Only the study information really bear witness quite the oppose.

Here'due south how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Table 4 from the study, shown beneath, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their kickoff vaccine in their tertiary trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their outset or second trimesters. (You have to read the fine print below the tabular array to see this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies striking the xx-week mark. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the tabular array.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their starting time or 2nd trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions amid these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

Information technology is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known equally "stillbirths" and non spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have maybe occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.

Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the incorrect denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.

Put some other way, it is incommunicable for a adult female who was vaccinated for the starting time time during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous ballgame" in the first twenty weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the commencement 20 weeks (and meaning women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't exist included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous ballgame rate.

The authors of this study should receive an honor in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they obviously tried to pull a sleight-of-hand fox to brand it appear that vaccines are condom for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than four out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set. (Information technology's a small set of 127 meaning women, so nosotros'd like to run into a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in society to get a more articulate moving-picture show.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A elementary way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a scientific discipline written report asking the question, "What per centum of lemons are xanthous?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number 50. They mistakenly separate 50 into 100 because there are 100 total slice of fruit, then they declare, "l% of lemons are yellow" considering it's fifty/100.

Merely the other l pieces of fruit can't possibly be included because they're limes, not lemons. And so the correct math is 50/fifty, which means 100% of the lemons are xanthous. That's the correct answer.

In this science paper, they are using 827 every bit the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were merely vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the time window during which a "spontaneous ballgame" can occur. And since pregnant women aren't time travelers, they can't become dorsum in time and report a spontaneous ballgame from months earlier.

If vaccine scientists either can't do this bones math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — and so "scientific discipline" has already failed its core hope: to offering "evidence-based" conclusions to empathise the globe around u.s.a..

Even so when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the start 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is simply 12.6%. Why? Considering they're covering up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, nearly likely.

In fact, the fundamental author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is likewise named in numerous other studies that claim to document adverse reactions in diverse vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro brand the aforementioned fault in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no significant risk of adverse events? For example, hither'due south some other study he co-authored: "Adverse events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Result Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That study concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did not place whatsoever new or unexpected prophylactic concerns after TIV-ID."

But is that conclusion based on bad math, like the written report on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We phone call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this same study architect has made the same systematic error (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. Information technology wouldn't exist the start fourth dimension one author was found to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how scientific discipline progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We can't just take bad math and call information technology "scientific discipline" when the bad math doesn't check out.

Spike poly peptide injections into pregnant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the mean time, information technology'southward clear that four out of five pregnancies are existence terminated past covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first xx weeks (at least, according to the small data set nosotros have then far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.

Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine fasten proteins directly attack reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with homo cells, it should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals. Although he does non characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than than lxxx% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls information technology an "barbarism" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You can hear him in his ain words in the following interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that live births may plummet by iii.ii million over the adjacent year, in the Us lone, if every meaning woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is beingness called a medical "barbarism."

The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine industry is at war with the homo race. And live-built-in babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's state direction czar once characterized human children as an "ecology risk."

This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race past the institutions of scientific discipline and medicine, both of which long pretended to exist motivated by a desire to aid humanity, but are now clearly shown to be working towards humanity's destruction.

Learn more in today's mind-opening Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://world wide web.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

cloudablat1994.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Share this post